SB = Interviewer
DS = Dr. Ronald Shimschuck
SB: Dr. Shimschuck, thank you once again for taking the time to speak to us about this very important subject.
DS: You’re welcome. I’m always a bit nervous about this but it’s the right thing to do.
SB: Let’s start with some basics. Why have you gone public?
DS: I still wrestle with that decision every day, and to be frank, I’m by no means certain going public, as you say, has any benefit. It may, it may not. As a scientist, I spent much of my life seeking simple answers to difficult questions. Going public is the most difficult question I’ve faced. I’m dedicated to the truth, and for a long time I helped conceal a truth that could cost millions or billions of lives. Like many of my colleagues, I feared for my life, for that of my beloved Darlene, God rest her soul – she passed away a year ago. Now I have no living relatives. And my conscience could no longer bear the burden of guilt. I had to go public for humanity.
SB: Are you saying “they” threatened your family if you exposed information on Nibiru?
DS: They didn’t have to explicitly say it; the threat was implied. This reason, as I believe a previous interviewee pointed out, is why people with knowledge don’t make deathbed confessions: for fear some harm will come to loved ones. There was no doubt in my mind that had I talked a year or two ago, that they would have got to her first to make me suffer, then taken care of me. They can’t take her from me now.
SB: How do you explain the sudden surge of astronomers now willing to talk about Nibiru? Many do have living families. Aren’t they jeopardizing their families’ safety?
DS: Although I can speak only definitively for myself, I can speculate. In a row of dominoes, when one falls, they all fall. Here we have the opposite, one man standing up after another, essentially reinforcing its companion - safety in numbers, that sort of thing.
I doubt I would have come forward if others, like Dr. Eugene Ricks, hadn’t taken that first, bold step. More importantly, we have reached a precipice. Five, ten, thirty years ago, world governments had a “safety net,” the mistaken belief they could conceal the truth almost indefinitely. Well, that time has elapsed, and though they hate to admit it, I believe they realize the truth about the interloper (Nibiru) cannot be hidden much longer.
SB: That makes sense. How long has the government(s) known about Nibiru? And have they all worked together to keep it secret?
DS: First, I believe they’ve known since the ‘50s, but I’m positive since the early ‘80s. And, yes, major world governments, each preparing in their own ways, conspired against the world’s population to keep this the most carefully kept secret in the history of so-called secrets. The big three – US, Russia, China – have been in “Secondary Protocol” for some time, meaning their underground living quarters are prepared, secondary and provisional governments stand ready, and I could talk for hours on that alone.
SB: Perhaps if we have the chance for another interview. In our previous discussion, you said that chemtrails are one method via which the powers that be try to hide Nibiru. To play devil’s advocate, you previously stated Nibiru is still far enough away that it’s visible only at high altitudes in the southern hemisphere, with powerful optics. So why would they need to currently employ chemical? And how do you respond to detractors who say that chemtrailing has a different purpose, like say to poison the population?
DS: I’ll answer the second part of the question first. It’s entirely possible that atmospheric aerosol spraying serves multiple purposes. I really don’t know. But nothing surprises me anymore. I know as fact one reason is to impede, obscure, and delay visibility of the Nibiru system.
This I know because I saw documentation on the subject. They are spraying now – have been for years – because the chemicals, and I wasn’t privy to the precise chemical composition, translucent, reflective nanofibers act energetically with aluminum oxide, another ingredient, to create a barrier, screen, or “haze” to limit visibility of both natural and artificial optics. There is marginal degradation over time, but the compound persists in the atmosphere and continues to build upon itself.
SB: As simply as possibly, what is “Nibiru?
DS: It is a generic or catch-all term for what I and others refer to as “The Nibiru System,” essentially a solar system of its own which will intersect with ours. At its heart is a brown dwarf star approximately one-eighth the size of our Sun. The brown dwarf is orbited by seven planets or moons, some smaller than our moon, some larger than earth. Of greatest concern is the third planet of this system – several times Earth’s mass with a nickel-iron core. It is predicted this planet will pass within 0.3 AU of Earth.
SB: How far is that in layman’s terms?
DS: 27,886,742 miles, or one-third the distance from Earth to Sun.
SB: So no direct impact. We know your time is limited so I’ll finish up quick here. Worst and best case scenarios?
DS: Worst, extinction level event. Nothing on the planet will survive, not even bacteria. Best, pole shift accompanied by rising sea levels across all major bodies of water, volcanic eruptions, tsunamis washing hundreds of miles inland, magnitude 10 earthquakes along all major fault lines; six-to-eight in many other areas. Basically, all the worst parts of the Bible.
SB: When will it be here?
DS: Views differ. Some colleagues and I agree that events will unfold between September and December of 2016.
SB: As always, thank you for your time, Dr. Shimschuck. I hope we can chat with you again at least once more.
DS: Me too.